in every things But is it good that genuine, severe issues that are social memes on facebook?

in every things But is it good that genuine, severe issues that are social memes on facebook?

S ocial news tends to be a little fad-ish. Memes and some a few some ideas explode regarding the scene, are every where for a short span of the time|period that is short of}, then have a tendency to drift down into the ether, to never be heard from again. Whenever these memes are pet videos or quotes from superstars, this appearing and disappearing work does seem to be n’t a challenge. But just what about as soon as the media that are social are maybe not sweet and amusing, but horrifying and terrible? About them, and then—only a few days later—the issue has disappeared from our radars again whether it be expressing outrage over the situation in Aleppo or being exasperated by the latest instance of police violence against a person of color, real life situations often take on meme-like status via social media: they seem to come out of nowhere, suddenly everyone is talking.

Regarding the one hand, bringing people’s focus on dilemmas impacting the life of

fellow people is really a .

We usually inhabit ignorance regarding the suffering and pain experienced by other folks inside our community the whole world. Having some light shed on can really help us better love our neighbors—and maybe even reflect on methods we possibly may be unknowingly complicit regarding the activities causing this discomfort. Engaging these problems on social media marketing provides a kick off point for conversations that commence to alter hearts and minds.

The meme-ing of social issues can sometimes reduce complex webs of cause and effect into simplistic “good guy v. bad guy” narratives that make it easy to become angered and indignant (almost always at someone else), but do little, if anything, to change the conditions which led to the problem in the first place on the other hand. Whenever it becomes a tale associated with the good dudes plus the bad guys, we hardly ever cast ourselves due to the fact crooks , also it’s hardly ever the expected good dudes who’re evoking the issue. Obviously, then there isn’t much I can do to fix things—except get mad at the bad guys and try to shame them into changing if it’s the bad guys’ fault, and I’m not one of the bad guys.

Additionally the fad-ish nature for the thing that is whole threatens to make other people’s discomfort and suffering into fodder activity, another product to be consumed by

voracious appetite for what’s new. This isn’t to express we see that we enjoy the pain and suffering. But also for the sake of our own feelings, it remains largely entertainment, and our indignation at the horrors of Aleppo seem to become one with our sadness at the death of a child on Call the Midwife or our horror at the brutality of war depicted in Vikings or Game of Thrones if we are saddened by what we see, as long as we are doing it. If

anger about innocent fatalities or racial injustice if the victims are genuine individuals or figures for a tv series, we need to ask whether we have been focusing because we worry have a glance at the web-site about the issue—or because we somehow benefit from the righteous indignation. Do we should make things better—or are we simply shopping for a cause to be aghast at exactly how things that are bad?

Of course, maybe not everyone—perhaps not many people—engaging issues that are social social news has been doing therefore for his or her very own advantage. But once we make an effort to assess our personal engagement with social problems via social media marketing, we must be truthful with ourselves and our personal motivations. Are we truly being relocated, via social networking, love

neighbor and God’s creation—or are we just in search of somewhere to direct our anger, fear and anxiety? Are we searching for redemptive reconciliation, or catharsis that is personal? Do we acknowledge that people are element of the issue (the sinful brokenness of creation), and therefore challenge ourselves to engage in the solution—or are we simply trying to verify just exactly exactly how terrible the whole world is “out there”, so we are able to be a little more smug about how exactly nutrients are “in here” (whether “in right here” means whilst the Church, or as liberals, conservatives, and whatever other team we might hold dear)?

We wonder often about our engagement that is own with problems on .

Why do we share the things we share, engage the problems we engage, prevent the problems we avoid? All of us probably needs to think more carefully through everything we desire to achieve by

engagement:

Am we hoping to raise understanding? In that case, with who? Exactly how am we framing it making sure that those who aren’t currently conscious of it will probably engage along with it, rather than tuning it down because that’s maybe not something they worry about?

Have always been we desiring to construct community and produce spaces that are safe phrase, discussion, validation and affirmation? In that case, how do you bring into the those whom require that community—and keep out the people whom threaten to undermine it? How do you ensure that we myself have always been perhaps not undermining somebody else’s safe community through my words and actions? If you don’t every post is provided because individuals wish to debate this issue at hand, how can I understand when debate is welcome so when it’s time for you remain out of it, or when it is instead offer encouragement of review?

Have always been we wanting to be active in changing the issue or situation at hand? In my situation, here’s the trickiest one. of similar concerns right here as you can find with increasing understanding ( frame it, that do we share it with, etc.), but additionally, there are the additional concerns concerning changing the specific situation: do we want people’s hearts and minds, and hope that leads to social and changes that are perhaps legal? Do I would like to replace the guidelines and/or social conditions, and hope that specific hearts and minds will alter later on? In addition, there are questions regarding why We (or some other person) should desire to alter this specific problem, rather than another regarding the numerous problems with which individuals could possibly be worried. In the end, all those problems reveal us places where the planet is crying down when it comes to style of reconciliation we, as Christians, know can fundamentally just into the redemptive work of Jesus. Consequently, every problem can be an opportunity where God’s loving grace is working to make everything new (Rev 21:5)—but also an opportunity where other activities have reached work which could never be pointing toward love, elegance, or reconciliation.

2021 © Copyright Peterlee Arts Festival